More evidence that Soda is Satan
Jun. 4th, 2004 09:30 amNot all sugars are equal when it comes to weight gain
Researchers report that drinking beverages containing fructose, a naturally-occurring sugar commonly used to sweeten soft drinks and other beverages, induces a pattern of hormonal responses that may favor the development of obesity. It is estimated that consumption of fructose has increased by 20-30% over the past three decades, a rate of increase similar to that of obesity, which has risen dramatically over the same time span. Data from the present study suggest a mechanism by which fructose consumption could be one factor contributing to the increased incidence of obesity.
I've always thought soda was evil. I mean, it has caffeine, which has its own issues, and it has no nutritional content yet is high in calories. And the diet sodas have nasty chemicals in them... most have aspartame, which suppresses your body's ability to process food as anything but fat for a good length of time afterwards, according to a friend of mine, and suppresses the seratonin cycle promoting depression, according to a variety of research papers. Not to mention the cancer... Those with splenda may be better, but more and more studies are coming out with negative information about those too.
My originaly instincts are right. If I have the necessary willpower, I sould swear off soda, because it really is that bad.
Researchers report that drinking beverages containing fructose, a naturally-occurring sugar commonly used to sweeten soft drinks and other beverages, induces a pattern of hormonal responses that may favor the development of obesity. It is estimated that consumption of fructose has increased by 20-30% over the past three decades, a rate of increase similar to that of obesity, which has risen dramatically over the same time span. Data from the present study suggest a mechanism by which fructose consumption could be one factor contributing to the increased incidence of obesity.
I've always thought soda was evil. I mean, it has caffeine, which has its own issues, and it has no nutritional content yet is high in calories. And the diet sodas have nasty chemicals in them... most have aspartame, which suppresses your body's ability to process food as anything but fat for a good length of time afterwards, according to a friend of mine, and suppresses the seratonin cycle promoting depression, according to a variety of research papers. Not to mention the cancer... Those with splenda may be better, but more and more studies are coming out with negative information about those too.
My originaly instincts are right. If I have the necessary willpower, I sould swear off soda, because it really is that bad.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-04 09:37 am (UTC)Just sayin'.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-04 10:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-04 03:30 pm (UTC)About.com Urban Legends: Aspartame (http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/blasp2.htm)
Mayo Clinic list of artificial sweeteners (http://www.mayoclinic.com/invoke.cfm?objectid=382A0FA5-2E06-4970-90F98E444F969EF4)
no subject
Date: 2004-06-04 10:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-04 10:43 am (UTC)I still enjoy root beer and sprite every now and then though.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-05 05:29 pm (UTC)I find that drinking far less soda makes soda far less attractive to me, which has been a good thing in keeping off it.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-04 10:50 am (UTC)So, if you're going to have a Diet Coke, make sure you have a shot of vodka with every can, or kiss your brain goodbye in 20 years... There's a reason Aspartame is under FDA re-evaluation.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-04 03:42 pm (UTC)...believe what you want to believe but I prefer real scientific studies to internet urban rumors. Feel free to point me to real studies if you got them though. Oh and the FDA reevaluates things all the time -- it's their job -- there doesn't have to be any solid reasons for it.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-05 08:34 am (UTC)If you want real references, check some of the following I found by searching for "Aspartame Methanol" on google.
http://www.usenet.com/newsgroups/sci.bio.food-science/msg00352.html
http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame/methanol.faq
In fact, the only debunking of this I found was on aspartame.org, which is obviously a pro-aspartame site. Therefor any contrary studies are listed as "myths" because they wouldn't dare bad-name their own product, just as you'd have better luck turning lead into gold than you would getting the FDA to admit it was wrong. I'll admit, most of what's out there is people saying you can die from drinking a diet coke left in a warm car, which, if it were true, people would be dropping every day. However, it is not uncommmon for subtle and/or cumulative things like this to slip through the FDA, and since we have skeptics out there who perform their own studies, they come back up for re-evaluation years later.
And no, the FDA does NOT re-evaluate things "all the time". They're too busy with new products to worry about things that have already passed, unless they're given good reason to do so. If they did, it wouldn't have taken over 20 years since it's approval for it to come back under review...
On another note, knowing many people in the pharmaceuticals and food science industry, I do NOT trust things passed by the FDA to not be harmful. I merely acknowledged that someone said they were safe, and that someone is subject to fallibilty, bribes, etc... Data gets fudged, reports get lost, and testing is not always complete, or even relevant. The FDA (and all that it's hands are in) is a dirty business.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-04 10:58 am (UTC)i don't believe for a minute without a good solid reference that aspartame does anything to lipid metabolism, and the amounts of methanol that get produced as a byproduct are negligible. i bet i get more from just breathing in lab all day.
given that a lit search i did on aspartame a while ago turned up "it's basically innocuous," i'd like to see what references the claims you make come from, as if i missed something, i need to sharpen my research skills.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-04 11:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-04 11:12 am (UTC)Its back to water...
no subject
Date: 2004-06-04 12:09 pm (UTC)Re: soda
Date: 2004-06-04 12:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-04 12:48 pm (UTC)Anything in a can can and most likley contains corn syrup.
I read about this whole thing when I was working on my MBA. Turned out that, ADM was doing price fixing so that their corn syrup would be artificially cheaper than sugar. This forced Coca-Cola to start using corn syrup, and once that happened, due to supply and demand, various products stop using sugar and there was no turning back.
Drink Soda that is manufactured outside of this country (say, Calpico of Japan, or Mexican Coca-Cola). Eat organic and fresh veggies (all canned veggies have corn syrup in it).