danaeris: (Default)
My father sent me this article, and I have to agree with him: It's one of the most balanced responses to recent events I've seen, published in the Tech section of USA Today.

Technology succeeds, system fails in New Orleans

In a way, it's rousing. It makes me feel righteous and angry, but also hopeful. Their Pravda cannot stand up to an army of citizen journalists. And maybe seeing the contrast between their lies and the truth in all this will help people to realize how dishonest the government is. This government, or all US administrations, or all governments? That's a topic for another debate.
danaeris: (Default)
http://www.dkosopedia.com/index.php/Hurricane_Katrina_Chronology

The above link is by far the best chronology I've found so far, complete with links to verifiable sources.

But, like a lot of what I've been able to find, it definitely has the potential of a left-wing bias.

There are a number of allegations that the right wing folk have made, but I haven't been able to find support for them. I'd love to see a timeline which included information on their side of the story, complete with links!
danaeris: (Default)
Well, here's the other side of the political argument: A forward from my dearest Daddy, siding on the right as always.

Anyone who has information refuting these arguments is more than welcome to share. They raise some interesting points but they don't back them up with much more than rhetoric, in most cases. The last paragraph is, um, priceless. Makes me want to bang my head against the wall, really.

As I research and confirm or deny facts, I will add the correct information in bold, with a link.


For those that live inside and outside the US that can't comprehend what is going on in the Gulf Coast states.
1. It is up to the city to declare an emergency and evacuate the poor.
2 If for some ungodly reason the city can't do it then it becomes a State responsibility.
3. If all else fails the Federal Government is asked for help and the President normally takes the lead in dire situations even though he has cabinet members responsible for all emergencies..

But if you listen to the Newscast and Jesse Jackson you would think the President is suppose to be the first responder which he is not!! You want to blame someone go after the City Manager of the cities affected for leaving hundreds of buses parked like you will see farther down.. Sorry the President doesn't own a bus to send them! Also did anyone hear Jesse Jackson offer any of the money he blackmailed corporations out of to help his own people..No and you won't either..he showed up to pad his on pockets as usual!

This needs to be broadcast far and wide:

1. It was President BUSH who initiated the evacuation orders and fed. disaster declaration, not the other way around-- Governor Bianco herself admitted this! MIXED, mostly false: Bianco declared a state of emergency on Friday August 26 (http://gov.louisiana.gov/Disaster%20Relief%20Request.pdf ). As did the White House (http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/08/20050827-1.html). It was Nagin, the mayor of New Orleans, who ordered the evacuation (http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2005/08/mayor-orders-new-orleans-evacuated.php), not Bush. It is true that the White House was the final signature on the Federal Disaster Declaration, but that's because that's how the process works; a state or city cannot declare a FEDERAL disaster. The declaration, backdated August 29 but not signed until Sept. 3: http://www.fema.gov/news/eventdfrns.fema?id=4808

2. The city didn't even attempt to offer transportation for their poor during their initial evac process. Check out: http://www.junkyardblog.net/images/NO-buses.jpg Edit:link broken
MOSTLY TRUE: If you visit the NO evacuation plan here and search for "Regional Transit Authority" or bus or somesuch in the page, you'll find that it was part of the evacuation plan... yet didn't happen. SOMEONE at the local level dropped the ball.

3. The FEMA response has been drastically slowed because of the violence which was due to the fact that over 50% of the New Orleans police walked away from their duties!! FALSE: The current percentage which have resigned, committed suicide, or are missing in action is only 13%.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/04/national/nationalspecial/04police.html?adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1125839324-Gx/WKaOOvv/dZllBg1criA


4. All the stupid uproar about money for the levee and the Army Corp. of Engineers is moot, as the levee failed at a POINT that WAS ALREADY UPGRADED!! UNVERIFIABLE: Information on the exact status of the levees and location of the breach is sparse. However, the levees may be affected by nearby sections as well, so even if the section in question was upgraded, if nearby sections were not, that could still lead to the breach. More information is required to confirm or deny this statement.

Start getting some facts out there, since the media, as usual, is only marginally interested in presenting them.

Check out the New Orleans emergency plan at:
http://www.cityofno.com/portal.aspx?portal=46&tabid=26
It is clearly the Governor and by delegation, the Mayor who are charged with ordering evacuation. This is to be done for a cat 3 storm. There is supposed to be an official in charge of planning emergency shelters (including 6 enumerated public schools). Nowhere is the Federal Govt mentioned.

In the plans, they mention evacuation zones, locations to be studied later. Apparently, it was never done. I agree with the comments above. Every time someone farts and craps their pants, everybody wants to blame Bush. The Mayor of New Orleans on radio the other night was a great example. Had he, the Parish and the State of Louisiana done their job, things would have be different. New Orleans is well renown for it's corruption in both the local government and the police department. If a rating were to be given for the execution of their emergency plans, I would rate them a PPP, which is an old Air Force acronym for, Piss Poor Planning" not to mention "Execution." Too bad for the innocent people in N.O. Maybe this will be a wakeup call for them to purge and elect a government that has the citizens interests at heart rather than their own selfish greed.....Charlie Stauffer

I will add this. Since our govt., or President, or anyone else for that matter, not even global warming, are responsible for Hurricanes, or where they are directed, not even good old Mother Nature, but One who controls the whole Universe, God, to be specific, then how do we know He hasn't puposely directed this storm to expose and destroy a corrupt city? Who are we to cast blame? Wasn't it God who destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah? If that happened today, the bleeding heart Liberals would want to build it back up again to what it was, and spend our money doing it.
Just a thought!


The forward also included the text of this article:
An Unnatural Disaster: A Hurricane Exposes the Man-Made Disaster of the Welfare State

by Robert Tracinski
Sep 02, 2005
www.tiadaily.com

It looks like a supposed newspaper which is published, edited, and written by one man. Hardly a reliable source, but nonetheless perhaps he has something worth saying. And, even if he doesn't, you must know your enemy to defeat him.

Edit
Well, I've skimmed the TIA article. The thing is a tautology. It doesn't really support anything with outside sources and includes intuitive wisdom from the author's wife. Um, yes. Whatever you say. *pats the right-wing zealot* That's right. Humans who have never been exposed to a welfare state would NEVER loot, pillage, and rape in a disastrous situation, and certainly, normal AMERICANS would NEVER do that! It must be the welfare state, which, as we all know, was in full force in Socialist Louisiana.

The one set of links he does provide are links which are intended to prove the corruption of the NO police force. The first link shows that the police who had headed to the Wal Mart to get supplies for their division (dog food, probably for search and rescue dogs, food for humans such as chili and spaghetti-os, t-shirts, probably necessary because many of them may not have changes of clothing and they are rescuing people who may only have soaked clothing (soaked in toxic sewage, from what I hear about the water in NO by now) and yes, admittedly, one DVD) did not stop the mob of looters who had descended upon the walmart. Yes, well. First of all, in an emergency, people need to get food somewhere, and if all the stores are closed, they aren't expected to starve. Second of all, for the majority of the "looters" who were actually looting valuable luxuries rather than disaster necessities, I'm sure there were just too many of them for the police to do anything. Stopping looting is not a priority. Rescuing people who are stranded without food or water is the priority, and these police officers probably had a mission: Get food and supplies, and get them back to the station/staging area. Do not get distracted by lower priority missions.

The second link is much more informative... apparently 200 of the 1500 officers in the NO police force resigned or never showed up, after a week of working around the clock (some never showed up, and some stopped showing up partway through, or resigned). Two committed suicide. If you read the article, it's a matter of humans getting overwhelmed, and not being able to "take it anymore." I'm not sure how I feel about those who resigned, but this does show that the police were understaffed as of Sept. 3, and possibly earlier.
danaeris: (hiss)
This morning, Bush was interviewed live on Good Morning America. What he said is generating a great deal of outrage.

The pertinent quote:
"I don't think anybody anticipated the breach of the levees. They did anticipate a serious storm. But these levees got breached. And as a result, much of New Orleans is flooded. And now we are having to deal with it and will."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2005/09/01/BL2005090100915.html

His assertion that no one could have anticipated the breach is patently false. This article, which was published before the hurricane hit, explicitly states,
But officials admit that the levee system, built to withstand a category 3 hurricane, could be easily breached by a stronger storm.

"If we had a direct hit of a category 4 or 5, or maybe even a slow moving cat 3, we would be totally inundated with water," said Geneve Grille, a levee engineer. "You couldn't pump it all out."
-http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/Weather/story?id=1074910&page=1&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312


Here's a special two part radio show from 2002 by NPR which talks about what a disaster it would be if a hurricane hit New Orleans.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1150366

Now, the painful truth is that several factors contributing to this tragedy have been caused by the current administration.
Cuts to disaster funding for the present and future, the deconstruction of FEMA, and more! You can read about it here:
http://www.phxnews.com/fullstory.php?article=24745

Of course, that fails to mention that a lot of the Louisiana National Guard is in Iraq.
http://archives.thedaily.washington.edu/2001/030101/N9.BIHquakebu.html

And, rumour has it that because the National Guard was pre-empted for Iraq, recruitment has been down -- people don't want to go to Iraq, so they won't join the National Guard.

Arguably, it goes even further than that. Environmentalists argue that a lot of Bush's administration's policies are causing the bizarre weather which led to Katrina.

More verifiable are the allegations in this column, which cover some of those mentioned earlier here, as well as some interesting information regarding the wetlands surrounding New Orleans. It's a biased source, though, so grain of salt:
http://www.workingforchange.com/printitem.cfm?itemid=19557

I'm being lazy, I know. I'm not looking for primary sources in some of these links. But, enough places which are relatively reliable are saying these things. I'm pretty sure they are accurate.
danaeris: (Default)
http://www.cnn.com/2005/HEALTH/08/23/fetal.pain.ap/

Summary:
Some experts claim that fetii can feel pain after 20 weeks. A new study at UCSF claims that it isn't until 28 weeks. Arguing ensues.

The debate is particularly relevant in light of proposed American legislation to require counseling for women considering abortions after 20 weeks, in which they would be told that the fetus/baby might feel pain, and would be offered anaesthetic for the fetus/baby which might pose a health risk to the woman.

Yay controversy! Um, err, not so much.
danaeris: (Default)
The head of the Women's Health division of the FDA has resigned from her post over the endless politically motivated delays heaped upon Plan B's approval.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050831/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/morning_after_pill
By LAURAN NEERGAARD, AP Medical Writer 8 31 05
WASHINGTON - The highly regarded women's health chief at the
Food and Drug Administration resigned Wednesday in protest of her agency's
refusal to allow over-the-counter sales of emergency contraception.
Assistant Commissioner Susan Wood charged that FDA's leader overruled his own
scientists' determination that the morning-after pill could safely be sold
without a prescription, and stunned his employees last week by instead
postponing indefinitely a decision on whether to let that happen.
"There's fairly widespread concern about FDA's credibility" among agency
veterans as a result, Wood told The Associated Press hours after submitting her
resignation Wednesday.
"I have spent the last 15 years working to ensure that science informs good
health-policy decisions," Wood, director of FDA's Office of Women's Health,
wrote in an e-mail about her departure to agency colleagues. "I can no longer
serve as staff when scientific and clinical evidence, fully evaluated and
recommended by the professional staff here, has been overruled."
It was an unprecedented public show of discord for the FDA, and prompted
lawmakers to call for congressional hearings into whether the nation's leading
public health agency allowed politics to trump science in determining the fate of
the morning-after pill called Plan B.


The stance I hold on this, and the stance those I've spoken with on this hold, is this:

The FDA is supposed to determine if a drug is safe for the user, and approve it based on scientific evidence. Plan B has been proven to be safe for the user, based on scientific evidence, and should be approved by the FDA.

It is then the government's role to arrive at some conclusion as to whether it is ethical or right for Plan B to be used, and outlaw it, or not.

These are two separate processes. It is essential that they remain separate.

To be devil's advocate, my stated position starts from a position wherein the fetus/child is assumed to not be a life at the stage where Plan B is used (72 hours after conception, iirc). If you go by the assumption that both lives exist, and have equal rights under the law, then the FDA should NOT approve it, because it obviously is not safe for the fetus, any more than rat poison is safe for toddlers. Neither position is really provable at this point; it's purely a matter of opinion. My impression, however, is that the consensus of society as a whole is that it is more important that women have access to things like Plan B in order to ensure their freedom and independence, than it is that every potential child have the opportunity to be carried to term.

Anyway. Interesting news.
danaeris: (Default)
So, the way I figure it, gas prices are currently being affected by the following factors:

  1. inflation

  2. The general price creep which has occurred over the last N decades

  3. "unrest in the middle east" aka the war on Iraq

  4. The devastation in New Orleans


Previous to the fourth factor, prices were hovering around $1 CAD/liter.

-Ignoring (4) for the moment, when/if the "unrest" rests, will the price drop at all?
-What does historical precedent tell us?
-If it does drop, by how much (ie. how much of that dollar is due to inflation and price creep, and how much is due to unrest, and how much of it will the oil companies hang keep even though the original cause is gone)?

Regarding (4):
-Has that particular increase peaked, or is it going to get worse? (we'll know soon!)
-How long will this particular factor remain in effect?
-How much will the price drop when it is no longer a factor? I'm sure oil companies will keep some of the increase Because They Can, but how much?

Oil sucks. We should run on chocolate! Then there would always be tasty chocolate-y goodness as well as fuel lying around. Yes!
Alternatively, consider Hamster power
danaeris: (Default)
Two friends of mine, in the past few days, have linked to the case of Maher Arar, a naturalized Canadian who was detained by US officials when connecting through a NYC airport on the way home to Canada, deported to his native Syria, and then interrogated under torture because he was suspected to be connected to Al Qaeda. He was finally returned to his wife and two children in Canada more than a year after his original detention.

A number of my Canadian friends cite this case as a reason they will not travel to the United States; none of these Canadians were born in Iran, Iraq, Libya, Sudan or Syria (the category for which a travel advisory was issued by the Canadian government).

My initial reaction is that they are overreacting. It's been a number of years since Arar was detained, and there haven't been any other cases like it, after all.

But, it's easy for ME to say that they are overreacting. I have US citizenship, so I'm protected by US law when I'm in the country. They HAVE to give me due process (although some would claim that even so, the US government will not necessarily do so if they decide that you are a terrorist).

I'd like to open this up for discussion; I'd like to hear what both Canadians and Americans have to say about it. But, I care for the people who have made these assertions, and I'm interested to hear their reasoning. I'd like them to feel safe explaining their reasoning, which means that I don't want anyone to respond with hostile statements such as "That's ridiculous" or "you're being paranoid." Please approach this topic with respect for the other people you are talking to. Consider it a hot button.

Readings:
NYT; you can get a log in from bugmenot.com
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/10/nyregion/10civil.html

CBC, including a detailed timeline that is up to date
http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/arar/

His own website, as linked above
http://www.maherarar.ca/

Profile

danaeris: (Default)
danaeris

August 2022

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14 151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 15th, 2025 01:53 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios