danaeris: (SchoolGirl)
[personal profile] danaeris
so the consensus seems to be that the word "proportional" is the problem.

What if I said "varies directly"? would that still be wrong?

Is there any way of saying, "When L increases, P increases," even if it isn't linearly?

Date: 2004-05-08 02:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] baniszew.livejournal.com
"There is a positive correlation between L and P" ?

Date: 2004-05-08 03:53 pm (UTC)
geekosaur: orange tabby with head canted 90 degrees, giving impression of "maybe it'll make more sense if I look at it this way?" (Default)
From: [personal profile] geekosaur
Agreed; "L and P are correlated" is probably the best you can do without specifying the type of correlation. (log log x, I think; that should produce a difference by a constant factor (== 2 since it's square root). Math types, feel free to correct me: it's been a long time since I needed to do this kind of stuff. :)
(deleted comment)

ha

Date: 2004-05-09 09:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] etherial.livejournal.com
That's "monotonously" for you non-Math Geeks.

Date: 2004-05-09 07:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] calling-to-deep.livejournal.com
I would just say "P varies with Q" if you don't have the space to give the actual relationship. I wouldn't use the word "directly"

Date: 2004-05-09 08:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] qedrakmar.livejournal.com
How about "A is proportional to the square of B"?

Profile

danaeris: (Default)
danaeris

August 2022

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14 151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 22nd, 2026 07:03 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios