In and Out of Love
Feb. 5th, 2004 12:19 amSome conversations with friends and comments in various journals made me wonder about the evolution of "love" within long term relationships. So here's another fun poll. Sorry, there could only be 20 options for length of relationship; choose 20 and I will assume it is 20+
[Poll #244039]
[Poll #244039]
no subject
Date: 2004-02-05 12:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-05 12:55 pm (UTC)In any case, I think I basically agree. Most of my past partners -- including the ones where I initiated the breakup -- I'd happily be involved with again, though possibly not in the same way / at the same level as before. I don't buy the idea that relationships break down due to transcendentally incomprehensible "incompatibility". A partnership can stumble into territory that's inappropriate or dysfunctional, but if both people are basically decent and sane, still care about each other, and have the motivation, there's no reason why, after taking some time to cool off and gain a bit of distance, they can't explore options again to figure out what sort of relationship is functional for them. *shrug*
Regarding the phrasing of the final question... I'm chose the equivocal "agree with part", because I've never thought of myself as having fallen out of love with anyone, barring the one (rather extreme) exception... I agree that it's fundamental to care about somebody as a friend and partner (almost like a business partner), and for that caring to be enough for you to be willing to work things through with them even during periods when you're mad at them, aren't getting a euphoric buzz off their presence, etc. But I don't think of those periods as being periods where one "fell out of love". I think this is just semantic detail, and that those conditions fit your (Q's) working definition of "falling out of love" here. But I'm not positive.
Re:
Date: 2004-02-05 10:15 pm (UTC)I don't agree about the matter that people cannot be "incompatible." While there might be a wide variety of issues that people can compromise on, the problem is that on particular topics, one of the partners may not be willing to compromise. And that might leave the other with an unfulfilled need.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-05 09:57 am (UTC)I assumed years. It's not clear. years or months?
About maintaining a relationship. I think it's based on friendship and compatibility. The ability to have a partnership. Love is a very big part of it, but I don't believe in the "rode up on a white horse" kind of love.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-05 11:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-05 01:15 pm (UTC)Permanently falling out of love is another story... Oh God does that suck. When I got left by Mike (he let with KEVIN!) I just couldn't even comprehend that the love that had been there and been so strong, so open, so public, so involved and so enjoyable was so suddenly completely gone. I lost a bit of faith in men to be honest about their emotions after dealing with Mike. I said to him "You're GAY?! When did this happen!!!??". Sudden shocking revelations can be devastating.