Atkins/Long Beach diet
Oct. 19th, 2003 11:36 amSo I've been contemplating going on either the Atkins or the Long Beach diet (unseelie describes the latter as a modified version of the Atkins diet which is just as effective but is slightly more permissive, having analyzed Atkins to see what works and what doesn't).
Here's your chance to tell me why Atkins or Long Beach or both suck or rock. Have at!
Here's your chance to tell me why Atkins or Long Beach or both suck or rock. Have at!
no subject
Date: 2003-10-19 11:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-19 11:43 am (UTC)FWIW, right now I'm on a fairly balanced diet. But I'm not losing weight. I'm just maintaining. It's getting frustrating, because I feel like I'm denying myself of good tasty things and getting no benefit. I suppose if I didn't deny myself, I'd be gaining weight. *sigh* Frustrating body of mine...
no subject
Date: 2003-10-19 11:55 am (UTC)Is exercise helpful?
no subject
Date: 2003-10-19 12:08 pm (UTC)My metabolism is totally fucked up. I started dieting when I was 9 and stopped when I was 16. I was training 3-5 hours a day as a competitive figure skater. I was a size 3/4 or 5/6 most of that time. Now I'm a 13/14.
My goal is to be more around the 9/10 or 7/8 range. Ie. a medium instead of a large or extra large.
I do this mostly because *I* don't like the way I look in the mirror, but also because I feel my weight is unhealthy, and finally because I know it would please
Exercise would be helfpul if I were good at getting it consistently. I'm taking a dance class once a week for 1.5 hours, and that's good exercise, or at least, should help. I'm walking 40 minutes every weekday. I might start dancing on Thursdays as well, or start an aikido class, or something.
Ideally, I want to lose weight, and then I want to maintain that by eating healthy. I have a pretty firm grip on what that means. Atkins seems to do wonders for people fairly quickly... the concern in my mind is whether it will be bad for my health, and then whether the weight will stay off if I go to a normal, balanced diet afterwards.
And I can't go to a doctor because I don't have any insurance and I'm poor. And because this country is uncivilized, but I won't go there.
no subject
Date: 2003-10-19 12:11 pm (UTC)When I was dieting constantly and training about 2-5 hours per day (or something like that), I was between 114 and 120 pounds. According to the doctors, 120 pounds for my height is just within the ideal healthy range. So even with that much exercise and dieting, I had trouble staying within the ideal range. Which is ridiculous, in my opinion.
If I manage to lose the amount of weight I want and hit about 140 pounds, I will still be in the moderately dangerous range according to most doctors. Dunno what a nutritionist would say.
My body just tends towards heavier than the doctors seem to think is healthy. *shrug* I'm not going to hold myself to their standards because they are simply unreasonable.
no subject
Date: 2003-10-19 12:14 pm (UTC)As far as reaching 140 and still being in the "moderately dangerous" range, my doctor thinks that overall fitness matters more than absolute weight. For me, 180 or so would still be "moderately dangerous," but if I were fit, I'd actually be healthy there.
no subject
Date: 2003-10-19 12:58 pm (UTC)A healthy weight range for a 5'2" woman is between 130 and 150 pounds, says I.
I'm 5'2" also, by the way.
no subject
Date: 2003-10-19 12:54 pm (UTC)I eat whatever the hell I want.
Check out the website. It's totally different than it used to be. There's also websites out there that tell you how many points things are rated from over 100 restaurants so you don't have to count anything. Their online system has a buttload of items that already have the points in there.
This is not your mother's weight watchers.
no subject
Date: 2003-10-19 07:54 pm (UTC)1) WW-Points ~= Calories/50 + 9*(grams of fat) - 4*(grams of fiber)
(in I think '01 the revised schedule, they cap that fiber bonus at 4 total grams)
2) http://www.dwlz.com/restaurants.html
The weighing and measuring is pretty easy to eyeball after a little practice. And with some familiarity, most of the values become pretty easily guessed. Just FYI.
Atkins
Date: 2003-10-19 12:54 pm (UTC)My cholesterol levels have gone DOWN.
My kidneys and liver are FINE.
My energy levels are WAY UP.
I no longer get sick all the time.
I no longer get depressed all the time.
My joints don't constantly hurt.
I can climb over a wall now.
I can fit in clothes I couldn't fit into for over two years.
My hair is getting glossy and longer.
(must take many multivitamins!)
This diet has four stages, the last being a lifetime management stage, so you don't go on the diet, then go off it and gain back the weight and then some.
Losing fat is great. The wya I feel, healthwise, is even greater.
It's hard at first, The first couple of weeks you feel kinda crappy while your body switches over to ketosis. And then you feel so good, and realize just how awful you had been feeling before.
There is no evidence that atkins damages your kidney and liver. No studies have proven this. And everyone I have spoken to has had their cholesterol levels go down. You just have to have plrenty of fiber, potassium (spinach!) and lots of vitamin supplements.
no subject
Date: 2003-10-19 02:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-19 02:50 pm (UTC)1. go for nutrient-dense (not calorie-dense) foods. Stuff like beans, bright colored veggies, eggs and nuts in moderation, fish, whole grains. Try to cut out overrefined stuff, or keep it to a minimum. Basically, try to get the most nutritional bang for your caloric buck. You pretty much can't go wrong with raw or lightly cooked veggies, as long as you hold the butter/dip/stir fry oil.
2. Eat a variety of foods. Actively try new foods and work at enlarging the set of "healthy food that I like."
3. Drink a lot of water. Drink more than you think you need. Putting a dollop of pure fruit juice in sparkling mineral water encourages me to drink more water.
4. Listen to your body. From what I've heard, there are many variations on the Atkins diet, and different people respond very differently, given their various body chemistries. Some people feel very well and energetic on Atkins; others can't adapt. When I was trying to tweak my diet to make myself feel healthier, I kept a running log of what I had eaten and how it made me feel for a while.
So, I am actually on atkins...
Date: 2003-10-19 07:46 pm (UTC)Things I have noticed on the diet:
I am very dehydrated very often.
I am not having many cravings (except for the desserts at the bakery counter at the supermarket when I walk by).
I am cooking a lot more. I eat out on occasion, but it is an anoyance with the places I go. Few casual places do large good meat with no sugery topings well.
I would say that atkins is noticably more expensive then the equivelent meal with lots of carbs. I did not cook before, so I'm doing better, but if you don't have the time and stores to cook, it is going to be hard.
I am not very hungry. When I want to eat, I eat. Fat is satisfying. My parents(who see me about monthly) say I'm looking better. I have not had a single suger headache like I used to get. As far as I can tell, my body is not mising the carb, although I'm being carful about vitamins(and need to get a bit more fibre).
If you have any more questions, ask. As a minimum, if you are going to do the diet, get and read the whole book, or do similar deep reasearch so you really know what you are doing.
Re: So, I am actually on atkins...
Date: 2003-10-19 08:00 pm (UTC)Re: So, I am actually on atkins...
Date: 2003-10-20 12:04 pm (UTC)I need a datajack, so I can just soak up this sort of info as it becomes available...
no subject
Date: 2003-10-19 08:49 pm (UTC)Diets suck. All of them. The concept of radically changing what you eat for a period of time in order to rapidly lose weight is inherently flawed. Here's why:
What do I suggest instead? Well, tweaking your current exercise and diet habits to make the simple caloric input/output equations work slowly in your favor. I did this primarily by lifting weights, and by becoming more knowledgeable about caloric densities of foods. Basically, I started lifting weights to build some muscle to raise my metabolism so I'd burn more calories at rest; and I read a lot about nutrition and calories so I could modify my diet on the fly to still eat what I wanted, but to want things that are a little better for me. This eventually created some practical changes to my diet, like the fact that I eat less pasta now because I understand that the caloric density is pretty extreme for a non-desert food, and it's just not worth the cost to me. But none of it feels like deprivation, because I decided on the minor changes based on my own preferences, a sound understanding of nutrition, and the knowledge that the cold equation of (caloric intake - caloric outgo = weight gain/loss) applies.
It's not as easy as following someone else's lead... but then, nothing ever is.
no subject
Date: 2003-10-20 11:58 am (UTC)It's also good to cut hydrogenated oils completely, if possible, and red meat as much as possible, in favor of firm-fleshed fish like salmon, tuna, etc; apparently flaky whitefish like cod and flounder don't confer the same advantages.
no subject
Date: 2003-10-20 03:43 pm (UTC)