danaeris: (Default)
[personal profile] danaeris
Most of us care about our figure/weight/fat content because of vanity, and hence lots of body image issues are formed.
While I have some body issues and simply some desire to be thinner because its what I find attractive, I've also always been aware that I'm treading a thin line with regards to my health.

Apparently, I was more right than I knew... I just read part of this article and it was very interesting. Some quotes, and then the rest of the article behind a cut.

It was the accepted wisdom that these cells lived quiet lives as the body's cushions, insulation and fuel tanks. But in recent years, scientists have been stunned to learn fat is very busy indeed.

When fat cells accumulate into a large enough mass, they begin pumping out a toxic array of chemical signals.


and

Our new understanding of the secret life of fat has transformed the field of obesity research. Scientists now understand that blocking the molecular signals that fat transmits to the brain and body could lead to a thin pill. And that could be worth billions of dollars.


In the anatomy textbooks, the major organs are easy to find. The liver is always brown, the spleen is green, the heart is red and the small intestine is squeezed like a row of sausages into the abdomen. But one of the principal organs, present in close to 50% of North American men and women, is missing. Fat.



Fat cells are the colour of jaundice, greasy and thousands of times bigger than other cells. The average adult has close to 35 billion fat cells, or adipocytes, a number that balloons as high as 275 billion in the very obese.



It was the accepted wisdom that these cells lived quiet lives as the body's cushions, insulation and fuel tanks. But in recent years, scientists have been stunned to learn fat is very busy indeed.



When fat cells accumulate into a large enough mass, they begin pumping out a toxic array of chemical signals.



"It's a nasty soup that comes from our [fat cells]," says Daniel Drucker, a University of Toronto researcher.



Many scientists now consider fat an endocrine organ, like the pancreas. And nobody will ever want a transplant.



This explains why having a big pot belly often foreshadows such woes as diabetes, cancer and hardened arteries.



"Think of it as a tumour," says another researcher. "One that's caused by soft drinks and french fries."



If more people realized their "love handles" are in fact toxic, they might work harder to get rid of them, experts believe.



Our new understanding of the secret life of fat has transformed the field of obesity research. Scientists now understand that blocking the molecular signals that fat transmits to the brain and body could lead to a thin pill. And that could be worth billions of dollars.



"It's almost like a gold rush now," says David Lau, a University of Calgary endocrinologist and president of Obesity Canada, a non-profit research organization. "Everyone is looking for the magic bullet."



The rush started in late 1994, when researchers at Rockefeller University discovered that fat cells secrete a hormone called leptin. Derived from the Greek word, "to thin," leptin acts on the hypothalamus in the brain, where the hunger and satiety centres are located. It was the first time research had shown fat can control appetite. Fat deposits, it dawned on scientists, are really organs.



"[Leptin] was the transformational discovery," says Dr. Drucker. "The world realized fat is more of an active player than we previously appreciated."



Since the discovery of leptin, researchers have found dozens of molecules made by fat.



A little fat is essential to human survival. In normal amounts, fat cells make adiponectin, a beneficial hormone that makes the body more sensitive to insulin. But too much of a good thing can kill.



A never-ending avalanche of new studies show that when large numbers of fat cells accumulate, especially in the belly -- creating the dreaded "apple-shaped" body -- they begin secreting chemicals known as adipokines, many of which trigger disease.



For example, an adipokine known as resistin -- resistance to insulin -- is believed to cause blood sugar levels in the body to rise, leading to type 2 diabetes. More than 150 million people around the world suffer from this disease, a number predicted to rise to 280 million by 2025.



"This is just a huge epidemic in the world," says Bernie Zinman, director of the Leadership Sinai Centre for Diabetes at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto.



"There are 1.5 million Canadians who have been diagnosed with diabetes, and about 750,000 who have it but don't know it yet."



Accumulations of fat also churn out tumour necrosis factor-alpha (NTF-a), which causes rheumatoid arthritis, and C-reactive protein, which is linked to atherosclerosis and heart disease. This explains why obese people are often stricken with multiple health problems, which often vanish when they lose weight.



However, a person who was once fat is different from someone who was always thin.



"If I gain 20 kilograms and then I lose 20 kilograms, it's not certain I will have exactly the same biology as if I had not gained," says Angelo Tremblay, a professor of preventive medicine at Laval University in Quebec City.



This is because humans are born with billions of tiny "baby fat cells," called preadipocytes. If we consume too many calories, filling our adult fat cells to bursting, they send out a molecular signal to the preadipocytes to mature.



Before they can grow up to a life of storing body fat, however, these immature fat cells must divide at least twice. So not only do billions of new adult fat cells add to a burgeoning waistline, billions more baby fat cells are born.



Diet and exercise reduce the amount of fatty oils stored in each of these fat cells. But they don't reduce the overall population of fat cells, with their cellular machinery, which may continue to pump out nasty adipokines, screwing up the body's normal hunger and satiety signals. This is why diets often tend to fail. Once fat, people will always struggle against their own bodies to be thin, which is why most obesity experts place their greatest hopes on prevention, not cure.



"Childhood obesity is where we're really falling down," says Dr. Zinman. Children who are obese, carrying a fat organ in their bodies for decades, are more likely to face long-term medical woes.



Some experts say it's useful to compare fat to cancer, particularly since the growth and proliferation of new fat cells can sharply increase the risk of breast, prostate, colon and other cancers. Studies now link the adipokines that switch on baby fat cells to the growth of these cancers, which means the same molecular forces that expand girth also expand tumours.



Reducing weight can prevent the formation of these new fat cells and the cancer risk that rises with them.



"If you can reduce body weight, you can reduce cancers," Dr. Lau says.



"If they're told they're 40 pounds overweight, people think, 'Don't worry, I can knock that off sometime,' " Dr. Drucker says. "But if you tell them they have cancer and they're going to lose 15 years of their life, they don't take it so lightly."



The cancer analogy is now being applied to research, where some scientists are destroying fat cells using a method of killing cancer. Last year, U.S. researchers used a promising type of anti-cancer drug, which deprives tumours of a blood supply, to combat weight gain in rodents. The endeavour was based on the idea that fat tissue, like tumours, requires an extra supply of blood to grow. Fat tissue is filled with tiny blood vessels, which proliferate as the body thickens.



Maria Rupnick, a researcher at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, fed obese rats with experimental cancer drugs known as angiogenesis inhibitors to prevent excess weight gain. The drugs did more than prevent gain. The overweight mice lost significant amounts of fat -- in some cases 50% of their bodyweight.



"We were surprised by how much weight they lost," says Dr. Rupnick, who reported the discovery in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.



Dr. Rupnick says fat tissue, like tumours, probably has fewer stable blood vessels than the rest of the body. The drugs probably destroyed capillaries in the fat tissue, leading to the death of fat cells. Moreover, once the "fat organ" had disappeared, the mice developed a normal appetite.



Dr. Rupnick says further study is needed to understand the drugs' effects.



Until then, or until a magic bullet is found, new anatomy textbooks should add a bright yellow organ to diagrams of the abdominal cavity.

Date: 2003-09-10 11:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coffeekitty.livejournal.com
jeez. the fat/cancer analogy is just plain bogus here. cancer is a disease in which cells lose their normal controls on proliferation. while fat deposits may, annoyingly, get larger, the proliferation of fat cells that they describe is entirely normal. There is no loss of cell cycle checkpoints or abnormal signal transduction going on. Comparing a fat deposit to a tumor is plain absurd from a molecular or cytological point of view. Fat cells do not have the chromosomal abnormalities characteristic of cancer cells. They do not lose normal adhesion molecules like cancer cells do. That analogy is just playing on the "ew, gross" reaction of people who don't understand what cancer is on a cellular level.

The bits about fat cells secreting hormones is somewhat more based in fact, and it's not news that fat cells secrete hormones. However, some bits of that make me dubious that they have checked their facts terribly well. For example, tumor necrosis factor and C-reactive protein are immune system proteins. I am dubious that fat deposits themselves actually secrete these proteins - TNF is a cytokine, secreted by helper T cells, and C-reactive protein is a component of the complement cascade, which is part of the innate immune system. Implying that TNF itself is abnormal and harmful is utterly absurd - it's an essential component of the cytotoxic immune response. It keeps you alive. It is possible for abnormal production of TNF to be harmful, but having enough TNF is necessary to your continued good health. C-reactive protein is involved in the development of an inflammatory response, which, again, is vital to effective immune function. I would believe that fat cells secrete hormones that cause an overactive inflammatory response, but I don't believe that they themselves manufacture C-reactive protein directly, and I don't buy that the mere presence of CRP is a disease condition.

I'm also a little suspicious of the term "adipokines," which i have not seen anywhere else. it may be used, but the sort of "-kine" with which i am familiar, cytokines, are immune system signalling molecules that are active, in general, over very short distances, not the long-range effects that they describe. having read nature and science articles on obesity and not remembering that term, it smells fishy.

anyway, this article is unfortunate, because it's based in fact, at least in part - fat deposits do secrete chemicals that, when secreted in improper amounts, can compromise health. However, their explanation of the mechanisms by which this happens is way misleading, and the fat/cancer analogy is just plain ridiculous.

i also think that it's kind of irresponsible to make people think that all fats are toxic. your cell membranes are made of lipids. lipids insulate your neurons. fat deposits, in some amount, are necessary for proper hormone balance. articles like this lead to people malnourishing their kids and then be surprised when their fat-free toddler has neurological problems. sheesh.

Date: 2003-09-10 12:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] danaeris.livejournal.com
Thank you for the info... grr. I should just stop paying any attention to newspapers. They aren't really capable of accurate reporting, especially on science and technology. One of the editors here has a friend who works a daily newspaper, and her friend estimated that 80% of what they publish is wrong in some way. 80%!

In spite of all this, I think I need to research this. It sounds like there's some interesting research going on in this field and new discoveries and all, but if I want to really learn about them, I'll have to go closer to the source.

Date: 2003-09-10 01:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coffeekitty.livejournal.com
yeah. i think that part of why i got so steamed up over this article is that obesity research *is* an exciting field right now. researchers *are* making some very interesting discoveries about lipid metabolism and how it interacts with various tissues, and researching it would probably be very interesting - it's a great field, and it ticks me off to see shoddy reporting of something that is, at its core, substantial. Look for some science / nature review articles - i believe that there have been reviews of current research in both recently.

Date: 2003-09-13 01:39 am (UTC)
auros: (Default)
From: [personal profile] auros

So, I fwded the text of the article, with a comment that a friend had been concerned about it, to my dad, who is an endocrinologist (and in fact, one of the leading authorities on the intersection of endo and gerontology -- how hormones, including those now known to be produced by fatty tissue, interact with the aging process). He had this to say:

The article is a bit over-dramatic in its language and emphasis, and a bit oversimplified in terms of the science, but essentially accurate. Fat and especially abdominal fat is clearly very active in producing a variety of signalling molecules which can have deleterious consequences for heart disease, inflammation, and glucose tolerance. The cancer connection is less clear; although epidemiological data suggest a relationship between cancer and obesity, mechanism(s) unknown. The bottom line is, it's good to be lean, but not too lean; the relationship between fat and mortality is "U-shaped" and looks sort of like this:

[ ascii picture that got mangled because it wasn't written in a fixed-width font :P ]

If your friend is not morbidly (BMI > 32) obese, tell her not to worry. Women tend to have more hip and thigh fat and less belly fat (pear-shaped instead of apple-shaped) and this is relatively benign.

Profile

danaeris: (Default)
danaeris

August 2022

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14 151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 22nd, 2026 03:05 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios