I've been assigned to find 30 really interesting science questions for our Q&A special. Post some question ideas here and maybe they'll get answered by one of our experts when this issue comes out.
(example questions: "Why do clouds float")
(example questions: "Why do clouds float")
no subject
Date: 2008-05-13 11:02 am (UTC)Dishwashers
Date: 2008-05-15 06:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-13 11:55 am (UTC)Alternatives to petrol
Date: 2008-05-15 06:28 pm (UTC)There is nothing on the horizon that is a drop-in-replacement that can be used in exactly the same way as we use petrol right now. So... Is wind power better than bio-ethanol? One of them is great for generating electricity and can be a replacement for using oil-fired power plants, but you can't realistically put a windmill on your car; the other is a horribly inefficient way of generating electricity but is fine as a portable fuel source for internal combustion engines to replace petrol for your car. Either requires some investment in replacing/upgrading/changing the relevant part of our infrastructure (heavy wind power usage has some issues on days when the wind isn't blowing, ethanol has some issues being distributed the way we distribute gasoline; neither issues are insurmountable, but they're hard to compare). So, it's not clear that there is an answer to which of those is more promising...
And much of the way the world will move past petrol dependence may involve changes to society -- having more people live in dense cities with heavy mass transit reduces petrol usage, as does causing people to live in more temprate climates (drop the energy used for heating/cooling...). The value of either of those solutions requires asking what your ideal society is and how you weight different aspects of society (freedom to live where you want, the value of free markets and trade, etc.)
no subject
Date: 2008-05-13 01:07 pm (UTC)How do they make computer chips?
Why can't the doctor find out exactly what kind of flu someone has and give their friends the exactly right vaccine?
What's the strongest material known?
If all the ice in the world melts, how high would sea level rise?
If the entire earth used to be covered in ice millions of years ago, all the way to the equator, why didn't all life on earth die out?
When we radioactive date a rock and find out it's billions of years old, when does the "clock" start? When the rock turns solid, or way back when the old star exploded?
Can we mine magma someday? Pull out the liquid iron or gold and put the rest back?
no subject
Date: 2008-05-13 04:20 pm (UTC)We have, however, had at least one polar shift, so most places have, at some time in geologic history, had ice at some time, but not necessaily glaciation.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-13 07:10 pm (UTC)snowball earth
Date: 2008-05-15 06:00 pm (UTC)And covering all land to the equator with ice doesn't necessarily ice the oceans (even if they are cold enough, they're salty and in motion, so they're harder to freeze). Some sea life is quite happy in near-freezing water, and even under a thin enough ice sheet that some light gets through. If you go far enough back, most life was in the oceans anyway.
There's also a lot of life at volcanic vents at the ocean floor, most of which would never even notice if you cooled the surface to the point that you had a solid sheet of ice over all ocean surfaces.
So in short: it's easy to kill 99% of the life on earth. The last 1% is resilient to just about anything, and on long enough timescales will happily recolonize everywhere.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-13 01:22 pm (UTC)(This allows a fun riff into how floating ice doesn't cause levels to rise much at all, but ice up on land formations does, and all sorts of other phase-change hijinks.)
no subject
Date: 2008-05-13 02:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-13 04:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-13 04:35 pm (UTC)I want to know the frequency of the "global hum", and whether it is changing, and what causes it.
I want to know what would happen if you had edges passing each other at agles near light-speed so that the point of intersection went faster than light...and put something in that point...could it go faster than light, or would increasing mass make it impossible to move the edges, even though they themselves are not moving that fast. (Think putting a pin in the junction of closing scissors.)
no subject
Date: 2008-05-13 07:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-13 08:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-13 08:06 pm (UTC)http://www.takarapatch.com/