I keep on bursting back into tears.
It started with this:
Read with caution; details a very recent gay/trans hate crime on par with Matthew Shepard or Gwen Araujo
As I read it, I teared up a little. I was also a little nauseous, a new experience for me when reading something like that. My mother came into the kitchen and asked me what was wrong. I showed her a picture of Amancio, and explained what had been done to him.
"She was an idiot, of course." My mother asked why. I explained that unfortunately, in this day and age, flirting in drag with straight men in a straight bar is a dangerous activity.
She didn't say much. I said, "She was only 23." My mother said, "She didn't look that young."
Then she said to me, "What I don't think you're getting is that these men felt tricked and deceived." I looked at her in disbelief. "That doesn't justify what they did," I said, and my mother responded, "No, nothing justifies murder."
I shook my head. "This wasn't just murder Mom." I described what they did to Amancio. "It was the worst kind of hate crime."
The conversation went on. She seemed to be saying that these men's homophobia somehow justified the crime, or lessened their culpability.
I suggested the following example: If I were married, and went to a bar and flirted with a man, and then he found out I was married, took me to the river, raped me, slit my throat and cut off my wedding ring finger, it would be comparable.
And my mother said that it wasn't, because men are weird about their sexuality.
I was pretty upset and agitated at this point. I explained to my mother, not particularly calmly, that this is what the gay movement is about, aside from the goal of acquiring equal rights. That society as it stands promotes homophobia, will result in reactions like this at the end of the spectrum -- and that's not an acceptable status quo. Queer people shouldn't have to live in fear of their lives. So, the so-called gay agenda is simple: equality, tolerance, and acceptance. To reach a point in society where this sort of behaviour isn't considered acceptable legally OR culturally. To send the message that it isn't okay loud and clear.
I explained that the ideal is a society in which the murder of Amancio, Gwen, or Matthew, would be considered equally atrocious to the scenario I described above.
She grudgingly admitted that in such a society, that would be the case, but said that she questioned whether such a point could ever be reached. The implication was that she believed that homophobia and insecurity about sexuality is an inherently male characteristic (a preposterous attitude that betrays ignorance of other cultures in the present as well as throughout history).
I retreated to my room at that point, and sobbed and cried on
merovingian's virtual shoulder. I've finally stopped crying now, although I still feel nauseous.
My immediate reaction to my mother's responses was to feel that I could not live with this woman. To feel a need to be with My People, people who understood all of this, people who are also queer. I may be overreacting, or caught up in the moment of sorrow and mourning for this person I never knew. I really don't know. But I am THIS CLOSE to ditching all of my hopes of saving extra money up, and moving to Toronto, to get out of this house.
Gentle sanity checks are welcome.
It started with this:
Read with caution; details a very recent gay/trans hate crime on par with Matthew Shepard or Gwen Araujo
As I read it, I teared up a little. I was also a little nauseous, a new experience for me when reading something like that. My mother came into the kitchen and asked me what was wrong. I showed her a picture of Amancio, and explained what had been done to him.
"She was an idiot, of course." My mother asked why. I explained that unfortunately, in this day and age, flirting in drag with straight men in a straight bar is a dangerous activity.
She didn't say much. I said, "She was only 23." My mother said, "She didn't look that young."
Then she said to me, "What I don't think you're getting is that these men felt tricked and deceived." I looked at her in disbelief. "That doesn't justify what they did," I said, and my mother responded, "No, nothing justifies murder."
I shook my head. "This wasn't just murder Mom." I described what they did to Amancio. "It was the worst kind of hate crime."
The conversation went on. She seemed to be saying that these men's homophobia somehow justified the crime, or lessened their culpability.
I suggested the following example: If I were married, and went to a bar and flirted with a man, and then he found out I was married, took me to the river, raped me, slit my throat and cut off my wedding ring finger, it would be comparable.
And my mother said that it wasn't, because men are weird about their sexuality.
I was pretty upset and agitated at this point. I explained to my mother, not particularly calmly, that this is what the gay movement is about, aside from the goal of acquiring equal rights. That society as it stands promotes homophobia, will result in reactions like this at the end of the spectrum -- and that's not an acceptable status quo. Queer people shouldn't have to live in fear of their lives. So, the so-called gay agenda is simple: equality, tolerance, and acceptance. To reach a point in society where this sort of behaviour isn't considered acceptable legally OR culturally. To send the message that it isn't okay loud and clear.
I explained that the ideal is a society in which the murder of Amancio, Gwen, or Matthew, would be considered equally atrocious to the scenario I described above.
She grudgingly admitted that in such a society, that would be the case, but said that she questioned whether such a point could ever be reached. The implication was that she believed that homophobia and insecurity about sexuality is an inherently male characteristic (a preposterous attitude that betrays ignorance of other cultures in the present as well as throughout history).
I retreated to my room at that point, and sobbed and cried on
My immediate reaction to my mother's responses was to feel that I could not live with this woman. To feel a need to be with My People, people who understood all of this, people who are also queer. I may be overreacting, or caught up in the moment of sorrow and mourning for this person I never knew. I really don't know. But I am THIS CLOSE to ditching all of my hopes of saving extra money up, and moving to Toronto, to get out of this house.
Gentle sanity checks are welcome.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 04:33 am (UTC)I hadn't heard about this story at all... it is very sad and deeply disturbing. And I hope they can get the bastards that did it and put them away for a very, very long time.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 05:40 am (UTC)Please remember, I am queer and poly... this touches home with me.. I understand the horror and betrayal of something like this.. but I also know that we live in a world where things like this do happen and so did this young man. Would I love to be able to walk down the street holding BOTH my partner's hands? Sure. Can I? Nope. It isn't safe. What this young man did was incredibly dangerous, and I think maybe, even if your mom didn't understand how hard this hit you, that is the point she was trying to make. No, being stupid and gay doesn't mean you deserve to be murdered so despicably. Again, NOTHING could justify the actions of the murderer(s)... but we have to look at the situation in a realistic manner... and realistically... he humiliated men who have a lot of pride in appearing straight and they punished him for it. Do I wish the world didn't work that way?? Of course I do. I am sickened by the thought of this. But I'm not going to change the world single handed.. neither are you...
Talk to your mom calmly about this... maybe you can change her way of seeing it... maybe you can't... don't change long term plans because you are emotionally distraught. Wait it out. Understand that your mother comes from a very different generation and lives in a different reality than you do. If you show her that you are trying see things from her point of view, maybe she'll learn to see from yours. You may never agree, but you may be able to meet somewhere in the middle... and if, after you have handled things calmly and thought everything out.. if you still feel you need to move.. then take your time and do it right.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 06:42 am (UTC)Here's a theory that sorta excuses your mother:
Our mothers grew up when feminism was a little less advanced, and men's insecurity about their sexuality was a little more accepted. Your mom may prefer to just "accept that that's the way men are". It's easier than sustaining the anger and determination required to change men and change society. (This applies to any form of social change: it's easier to give up and be fatalistic.)
Arguing isn't going to to change your mom's attitudes much. Moving out isn't going to change your mom's attitudes either. Moving out isn't going to change the fact that you're related to somebody (probably many people) with less progressive views. Whether you live with your mom or not, she won't give you the kind of emotional support you needed this evening. There are certain topics you'll want to avoid with your mom, unless you want a difficult discussion; doesn't matter if you avoid them at the dinner table or on the phone.
That being said, I think there's a reason people leave home when they grow up. When we've developed our own attitudes and preferences (on sexuality or on sofa colour schemes), it's time to live independent lives. So you'll probably be happier living on your own - but moving out tomorrow will just extend tonight's argument. Try calming down for a few days, avoiding controversial topics, getting support from friends, and then go apartment hunting.
[/pontification]
no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 07:00 am (UTC)remember that men, from a very young age, are trained in rather homophobic ways, and as a result even the more accepting among "average men" don't have an easy time dealing with it. these men were clearly not among the more accepting.
i am not trying to say that this in any way justifies their actions, but it provide something of an explanation. to paraphrase a documentary i saw recently, "with this information, [this murder] is made no less shocking, merely less surprising."
it doesn't sound to me like your mother is misunderstanding what you're saying, instead it sounds like she's trying to answer the question that comes into many peoples' minds on hearing of this sort of atrocity: "why, god, why?"
no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 11:51 am (UTC)Your mother seems to be just barely on the intolerant side of the line. She's prepared to admit that the murder was heinous, but she takes "this person was stupid to provoke those guys" and switches it to, "those guys had some small justification for what they did." There's a fine line there that separates the truly modern viewpoint from the one just before it - as one commenter said, the early-feminist viewpoint. It's up to you if you can find a way to live with that difference or not.
The othe part of the problem is that your mother doesn't seem to be very empathetic. She doesn't know how to say things or do things so that people feel better. I don't know if she was trying but was too uncomfortable to reach out, or if she simply didn't realize she needed to reach out. Either way, it's the same result for you: she is incapable of supporting you emotionally. From what you've said in the past, I don't get the feeling she ever knew how to reach out.
Feel better. We can talk it all out tonight.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 01:02 pm (UTC)Given a few days and a couple fun parties, you'll be feeling less distraught with her. Don't let this foil your plans and goals, things will get better.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 01:53 pm (UTC)Would it have helped to say something like "Look, this conversation and your attitudes are making me very upset, can you either comfort me or shut up and go away"?
no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 02:36 pm (UTC)That's very much what I was thinking. The conversation started because dana was upset and her mom was concerned about it. Asking a crying person "what's wrong?" and then proceedign to argue with them about what is upsetting them is incredibly insensitive, whether the issue is gay tolerance or anything else.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 03:33 pm (UTC)Thank you for your words... they were considered, thoughtful of my feelings, and helpful.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 03:36 pm (UTC)I don't know if I'll move out in the short term at this point, but I certainly wasn't planning on packing my bags tomorrow. Nonetheless, your calm and considered thoughts were helpful.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 03:41 pm (UTC)I'm not sure what my mother was trying to accomplish. It's clear that she wasn't engaging her brain by the fact that she tried to argue with me about this when I was clearly in need of comforting, not debate, and she's realized that now and apologized.
At some point I will have to engage her about this, but I'll have to do it when I am able to stay calm. *sigh*
no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 03:46 pm (UTC)I see it from the point of view of the victim. I say the victim was stupid to do this, and although a person should be able to do something like this without fear of retaliation, that is not the world we live in today.
My mother identifies more with the perpetrators or perhaps more correctly, does NOT identify with the victim. The male pride was hurt so it is UNDERSTANDABLE that the perpetrators would do this horrible thing.
I'll have to write more on this in another entry later. But, for the time being, thanks for the comment which prompted a new way of looking at the situation.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 03:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 03:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 03:51 pm (UTC)The story is extremely recent, if you look at the dates. A lot of the facts in that link are currently unverified by a mainstream news source.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-21 02:53 am (UTC)