physics geeking: nuclear decay
Aug. 18th, 2004 12:35 amOK, so in beta decay, let's say you start off with 120/60 Nd.
You'll wind up with
120/59 Pr + e+ + nu
or
120/61 Pm + e- + anti-nu
Now, it was always my understanding that 120= protons + neutrons, and the second number (60, 59, and 61 respectively)= # of protons. What is puzzling me is... how can these guys be losing or gaining a proton, and have the mass number stay 120?
The reactions do not show a neutron being added to the system or a proton leaving the system. I HAD been assuming that the proton becomes a positron and a neutrino, but that doesn't explain the other case at all nor does it explain the constant mass number. So here's the explanation I came up with:
in Case 1
proton -> neutron + e+ + nu
in Case 2
neutron -> proton + e- + anti-nu
Is that correct? Anyone know? It looks like it works. But that doesn't mean its right.
You'll wind up with
120/59 Pr + e+ + nu
or
120/61 Pm + e- + anti-nu
Now, it was always my understanding that 120= protons + neutrons, and the second number (60, 59, and 61 respectively)= # of protons. What is puzzling me is... how can these guys be losing or gaining a proton, and have the mass number stay 120?
The reactions do not show a neutron being added to the system or a proton leaving the system. I HAD been assuming that the proton becomes a positron and a neutrino, but that doesn't explain the other case at all nor does it explain the constant mass number. So here's the explanation I came up with:
in Case 1
proton -> neutron + e+ + nu
in Case 2
neutron -> proton + e- + anti-nu
Is that correct? Anyone know? It looks like it works. But that doesn't mean its right.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-18 12:42 am (UTC)Seriously though Beta Decay sounds like a really sugary snack.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-18 01:01 am (UTC)It tastes so good, seems endless, and each bite is different -- it never even repeats itself!
no subject
Date: 2004-08-18 01:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-18 01:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-18 01:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-18 01:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-18 03:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-18 04:30 am (UTC)Off the top of my head, Proton -> Neutron + Positron + Something for conservation, but I don't remember what that something is. I would expect it to have mass equal to the energy of the positron expulsion, so a neutrino makes sense.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-18 10:50 am (UTC)Anyways, yeah, a neutron can decay into a proton and an electron. The electron is the "beta particle" of "beta radiation" or "beta decay". (And of course an "alpha particle" is basically a helium nucleus.)
I'm not totally sure what would happen in a beta decay where you emitted a positron instead of an electron. I remember that it's possible, but it seems like that would leave you with a negatively-charged heavy particle (as contrasted with a light particle like an electron, or a near-massless particle like a neutrino) in the nucleus, which is weird. Maybe it's actually a proton that emits the positron, thus turning it into a neutron?