Jun. 19th, 2008
LJ clients
Jun. 19th, 2008 06:49 pmSo I'm exploring the possibility of getting an LJ client.
OS X preferred, but online clients could be helpful too.
The ideal client would so some or all of the following:
-post to LJ and blogger
-allow me to access more than one LJ account
-allow me to edit friends groups and friends
-allow me to post only to my custom friends groups
-and, icing on the cake would include the ability to post pictures etc. (hard code would be fine)
OS X preferred, but online clients could be helpful too.
The ideal client would so some or all of the following:
-post to LJ and blogger
-allow me to access more than one LJ account
-allow me to edit friends groups and friends
-allow me to post only to my custom friends groups
-and, icing on the cake would include the ability to post pictures etc. (hard code would be fine)
So, what productivity software do you use?
I fantasize about something or several programs/systems/methods that could:
-be used as a to-do list
-enable multi-level nesting of tasks
-enable repeating tasks
-enable tasks that only appear once the previous task in the process is completed
-map out the steps needed to complete each project and then create some kind of timeline
-even better if it can sync with online calendars and/or to-do list applications and/or palm or blackberry
-even better if portions of it could be shared with collaborators
I'd be willing to pay some money for the right software, but it would have to be *really* good to be worth money, imo.
I fantasize about something or several programs/systems/methods that could:
-be used as a to-do list
-enable multi-level nesting of tasks
-enable repeating tasks
-enable tasks that only appear once the previous task in the process is completed
-map out the steps needed to complete each project and then create some kind of timeline
-even better if it can sync with online calendars and/or to-do list applications and/or palm or blackberry
-even better if portions of it could be shared with collaborators
I'd be willing to pay some money for the right software, but it would have to be *really* good to be worth money, imo.